Sharpe damages for loss of opportunity to bargain 1982 2 ox. It has repeatedly been described as limited to its own facts. Are the floodgates holding back a tide of negligence. The decisions in anns v merton london borough council 1978 and junior books v veitchi 1983 have been heavily criticised. Commissioner of police 1976 662 clay cross quarry services ltd. Junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd 1982 3 wlr 477, 21 blr 66. Throughout the book weir laments the direction in which the courts and parliament are pushing the law of tort. Attorneygeneral for the province of ontario v fatehi l9841 2 scr 536,542. Development of the law of negligence 1932 to 1988 designing. Second, the legislative history of interested party indicates that a potential plaintiff must show merely that he has been denied the reciprocal benefits of a common zoning plan. Site investigation and the law ice virtual library. Financial loss, what is it, and when is it covered by huib. Stevenson, it wasbased on a much wider principle embodied in passages in the speech oflord atkin, which have been quoted so often that i do not find itnecessary to quote them again here. The work was defective so junior books sued veitchi, not the main.
Hl 15 jul 1982 april 7, 2019 admin off construction, negligence, scotland, references. Whether youve loved the book or not, if you give your honest and detailed thoughts then people will find new books that are right for them. All publications university of toronto faculty of law. May 08, 20 the decisions in anns v merton london borough council 1978 and junior books v veitchi 1983 have been heavily criticised. Junior books v veitchi 1982 pure economic loss chain of contracts saw assumption of responsibility, duty recognised special relationship between customer and. Junior books is no longer to be restricted to its facts judicial jargon for this case is wrong, but we do not have the courage to overrule or ignore it. The area of debate is not whether a plaintiff should be able to recover. Veitchi, at least if one follows lord mackays speech. More duties occupiers, lessors, builders, employers.
Compensation for economic loss at the house of lords david cohent the decision of the house of lords in junior books ltd. Other readers will always be interested in your opinion of the books youve read. Junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd 1982 3 all er 201. The claimants in the case had had a factory built for them under a contract with a building firm. Recent and prospective legislative developments in products liability, workshop on consumer and commercial law toronto.
This scottish case initially caused some excitement amongst english academic lawyers who thought it heralded the fusion of contract and tort into a single law of obligations. Claiming in tort for pure economic loss 2010 26 const lj 270 sarabdeen j, negligent liability and econsumers in malaysia 2004 10 ctlr 200. Muirhead v industrial tank specialists ltd 1985, 1986. Fletcher 1979 740 clements inn, case of 1661 177 coddington v. Smillie, negligence and economic loss 1982 32 university of toronto law lournal 231. Relatively recent legal developments have established that subcontractors owe to employers, future owners or occupiers and to third parties, a duty in tort independent of contract to exercise reasonable care in carrying out their subcontract functions e. The defendants were specialists in flooring and were subcontractors to lay a floor in a factory which was to be used by the plaintiffs. John profumo was the secretary of state for war with the british government. In laying the composition floor the defenders used too wet a mixture and applied too thin a top coat and failed to cure the material.
The defendant was a specialist subcontractor brought in to lay a floor. Tableof cases published on 30 mar 2018 by edward elgar publishing. Evans 1982 234 church of scientology of california v. Mckendrick, 11 legal studies 326 smith v eric bush 1990 1 ac 831.
The junior books contracted with a business to lay a composite flooring in their factory. Junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd 1983 1 ac 520 was a house of lords judgment on whether a duty of care in delict exists between a contractor or subcontractor and an employer. Junior books contracted with a business to lay a composite flooring in their factory. Their lordships win faint praise for their efforts. Pages in category 1982 in british law the following 26 pages are in this category, out of 26 total. Junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd wikimili, the free. I entirely follow that if the conclusion is reached that the very purpose of providing the information is to serve as the basis for making investment decisions or giving investment advice, it is not difficult then to conclude also that the duty imposed.
Swanton, jane the convergence of tort and contract. Junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd 1982 ukhl peter o. Denning lj project gutenberg selfpublishing ebooks. Junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd 1982 ukhl 4 15 july. Junior books v veitchi 1982 3 all er 201 the courts began to retreat from the implications of junior books almost immediately. Pty ltd v the dredge willemstad 197677 6 clr 529,5445. Mcfarlane v tayside health board 2000 2 ac 59 parkinson v st james 2001 3. The house of lords fixed on the date when some actual damage occurs, whether discovered or discoverable or not, as the relevant date, in pirelli general cable works ltd. Junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd 1 ac 520 was a house of lords judgment on whether a duty of care in delict exists between a contractor or subcontractor and an employer. Junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd 1983 1 ac 520 was a house of lords judgment on whether a duty of care in delict exists between a contractor or subcontractor and an employer this scottish case initially caused some excitement amongst english academic lawyers who thought it heralded the fusion of contract and tort into a single law of obligations. It was the main reason for rejecting theclaim in the scottish case of dynamco ltd. Negligence in building design and construction designing. Pottinger 1981 52 commission of the european communities v. Denning became best known as a result of his report into the profumo affair.
The work was defective so junior books sued veitchi, not the. In junior books v veitchi co lid, the court dealt with a situation where juniour had contracted with a company called ogilvie for some building work, who had then subcontracted the flooring work to veitchi, who had laid it defectively. The defendant had ordered a meal in a restaurant and had consumed it with an. Junior books ltd v the veitchi co ltd 1983 21 blr 66 house of lords lord fraser of tullybelton, lord russell of killowen, lord keith of kinkel, lord roskill and lord brandon of oakbrook. Holland and hannen and cubitts ltd 1969 2 all er 1621 wilsher v. On 15 july 1982, the house of lords delivered junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd 1982 ukhl 4 15 july 1982. Indeed, the paradigmatic donoghue v stevenson case of a manufactured article requires, as an essential ingredient of liability, that the article has been used by the consumer in the manner in which it was intended to be used see grant v australian knitting mills ltd 1936 ac 85 at 104, and junior books ltd v veitchi co ltd 1983 1 ac 520 at. Put shortly, that wider principle isthat, when a person can or ought to appreciate that a careless act oromission on. That case was on appeal to the house of lords from scotland.
Firstly, the decisions open the floodgates to unlimited claims, where a defendant may have no relationship with the claimant. Nitrigin eireann v inco 1992 1 all er 854 winnipeg cond. Veitchi 1982 the major development in law of tort is in the case of junior books v. Essex health authority 1989 2 wlr 557 fitzgerald v. The factory needed a special type of floor in order to support the kind of machinery the claimants wanted to use, and the claimants requested.
The plaintiff had employed the main contractors to construct a factory and they nominated the defendants, as specialist sub contractors, to lay the floor. Veitchi in which the plaintiff owners of a factory sue a nominated subcontractor in tort for economic loss for installing a flooring negligently, the loss being the cost to replace the defective flooring. Veitchi in which the plaintiff owners of a factory sue a nominated subcontractor in tort for economic loss for installing a flooring negligently, the loss. See also junior books limited v veitchi company limited 1982 ukhl 4. Obtaining property by deception dpp v ray 1974 ac 370. Whilst the work was defective, it had caused no other harm, and thus seemed to come under the area of pure.
1157 1183 1168 558 85 841 950 1392 391 664 1180 1318 734 881 909 679 533 740 940 1594 75 961 1152 116 50 736 379 642 943 1251 1489 1072 807 1281 487